Friday, December 16, 2011

Thank you letters sent to BoE and Dep. Superintendent Phil Stover

On behalf of the MB Cluster, I have sent a letter of appreciation to the five Trustees on the Board of Education as well as Mr. Phil Stover, Deputy Superintendent of Business at SDUSD. The intent of these letters was to express our gratitude regarding the recent decision to support MBHS and PBMS in their current configuration.

Jennifer Tandy and I reviewed these letters prior to issuing them to each BoE member and Mr. Stover.  I hope you support the letters I sent in detail and spirit.

MB Cluster Thanks You - P Stover

MB Cluster Thanks You - S Barnett

Roster of Committee Members (Sept, 2011)

Hi,
It has come to my attention that we have a representative structure, but have not widely communicated the names of the Committee Members which represent the community and vote at MB Cluster Committee meetings.  These names should be available to all so everyone can have an equal voice.

Please be advised that this is the most recent Roster that I have today.  The Rosters from more recent meetings have been recorded by Amy Monroe.

Also be advised that the MB Cluster Committee does not select Committee Members.  Committee Members are selected by each of our six sites under the supervision of the Principal at each site.  Committee membership has been fluid and not necessarily consistent at each meeting.  Please contact the Principal of any of our sites for a list of current Committee Members.

The document below is fine print. Download a copy to your computer by clicking on the word "Roster" below. You will then be redirected to www.scribd.com. You should find a button on the right-hand side of the document labelled "Download". You may then save a copy on your computer and read it in a more legible fashion.

Roster

UT Article - Dec 16 - Healthcare Cost Reduction at SDUSD

Labor unions and the BoE are considering reducing benefits for employees to save money.  Some benefits for current employees seem to exceed the benefits of similar employees in other districts and other public sector jobs.



New SD school board leader announces health care pact

Evans says agreement is sign of growing unions-district collaboration

Maureen Magee
Kicking off his term as president of the San Diego city school board Thursday, John Lee Evans promised new collaboration with unions and announced a health care initiative that could save the district $2 million a year.
John Lee Evans
With labor officials at his side, Evans said employee groups are stepping up to help the San Diego Unified School District solve its fiscal problems.
“We are looking to emphasize the ‘unified’ in our name.” Evans said. “No whining, no excuses, we’re all going to find solutions.”
Unions have signed off on what he said could be the first of many agreements that could help save the district money. The initiative would give certain employees $900 if they agree to downgrade to a less-expensive health insurance plan for at least three years.
The plan will go to the board next month for approval and would be available to nearly 1,400 employees — about 10 percent of the district’s workforce — who currently subscribe to the most expensive health insurance plans — either a PPO or top-tier HMO plans. To save $2 million annually, at least half of the eligible employees would have to volunteer for the incentive.
Union leaders said they would do their part to share the district’s financial burden. But they stopped short of discussing salary adjustments, furlough days or other major concessions.
“We are committed to working with the district to try and find ways to save money because it helps kids,” said Ethel Larkins, who represents bus drivers and other nonteaching employees.
Unlike other districts and public agencies, San Diego Unified employees and their dependents get health care with no premiums. Trustee Scott Barnett, who was elected vice president of the board this week, has called for employee contributions to health care premiums, except for those covered by Kaiser. Unions have not commented on that plan that would save the district about $12 million annually.
The district dodged tough midyear budget cuts to its $1.057 operating budget with the release of rosier-than-expected state fiscal projections earlier this week. San Diego Unified will cut $7 to $8 million from this year’s budget by Feb. 1 — not the $30 million it feared. But the district still faces a deficit of about $73 million next year.
San Diego Unified has two ways to offset next year’s budget gap, Evans said: Layoffs or employee concessions.
The teachers union was the only district labor group not represented at Evans’ event. The San Diego Education Association signed off on the health care incentive but has balked at discussing major concessions the district has been pushing for months until there’s more solid information about the state’s finances for the coming year.
Superintendent Bill Kowba commended Thursday’s gathering of district and union officials.
“This is not just a symbolic, but genuine and fully engaged gathering of the team,” Kowba said.
Evans also reached out to the private sector, issuing “an open letter to San Diego business leaders” offering to “press the reset button on the relationship between the San Diego business community and our public schools.”
“We all have a mutual interest in strong San Diego schools that are so critical to develop a thriving San Diego economy,” the letter states.
Evans was unanimously elected president of the board on Tuesday by trustees. Although it is a largely ceremonial post, the president has historically served as the official spokesperson for the board. The president is also charged with setting school board agendas and maintaining order during public meetings.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

VOSD - City Schools Still Face Big Deficit

There seems to be a lot of information regarding the state of the budget for next year.  The budget reduction for SDUSD seems to be less than the original $100M discussed earlier this year and closer to $60 - $75M

City Schools Still Face Big Deficit


Posted: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 4:34 pm | Updated: 7:29 am, Wed Dec 14, 2011.

When the news came in this morning in that Gov. Jerry Brown would be making far smaller cuts to state education funding than previously expected, there were grins all round at a school board workshop at the San Diego Unified School District's headquarters.
But Ron Little, the district's CFO, wasn't smiling.
Reached after the workshop for a scrambled 30-second interview in the corridor, Little confirmed that the district must still cut at least $60 million from its budget next year. A district spokesman later upped that estimate to $73 million.
And there's the rub.
That state's cuts are considerably smaller than they could have been gives the district some breathing room, but all the move really does is turn what was a huge problem into a really big problem.
Superintendent Bill Kowba had presented the midyear cuts as the tipping point towards insolvency for the district. With huge cuts, the district could likely have been forced into insolvency, he told the school board last month. Without them, the district can survive.
But survival is relative. In this case, the district must still cut that $73 million out of its budget in order to survive through next year. That's an awful lot of money, and there are basically only three places the bulk of it can come from: More revenue from the state, concessions from employees or layoffs.
The governor has proposed a tax hike that could send more money to schools, but he's run into problems getting the two-thirds majority vote in the Legislature to get it on the ballot.
Then there are concessions. A big part of the school district's deficit next year is a double-whammy of promised employee pay increases and the expiration of five unpaid days off that will cost the district about $26 million next year.
With the vanishing specter of the midyear cuts, attention may now begin to focus squarely on whether the unions will be willing to renegotiate that deal. Without such renegotiation, the district could have no choice but to resort to layoffs.
By Thursday, the district has to send a preliminary version of next year's budget to the County Office of Education, which acts as a financial overseer of local school districts. That document must spell out what cuts the district will make to balance its budget.
Because the unions haven't agreed to reopen their contracts, the district can't include savings from possible concessions in that document. Instead, it must detail how many people will be laid off to balance the budget.
The school board plans to vote on that document, called a "first interim report," tonight. In its current form, the report calls cutting up to 700 employees, including teachers and campus police officers.
Little is currently scrambling to see if he can rewrite the report in the light of today's news from Sacramento.
Will Carless is an investigative reporter at voiceofsandiego.org. You can reach him at will.carless@voiceofsandiego.org or 619.550.5670.

UT Article - Dec 15 - SD school employees warned of cuts, layoffs

Article in today's U-T seems to state that SDUSD is not as badly affected as other districts in San Diego county.

It also reaffirms that SDUSD and all public school districts are under no obligation to provide transportation or schools that are "close" to the residence of its students.

The overall impact to our cluster is not clear.  It implies that State funding will be reduced specifically for busing.  This will put addition pressure on the MB Cluster to recruit parents to drive their own students.  Does this mean the cluster should organize some type of private transportation opportunities for students willing to pay?  

Schools searching for ways to offset busing cuts

Districts consider tapping reserves to maintain bus service 

Education officials across San Diego County are scrambling to keep school buses rolling after the governor’s announcement this week that the state will cut $248 million in school transportation funding beginning Jan. 1.
School districts plan to tap reserves or adjust budgets — if they can — to make up for the loss of about $15 million in state funding in the county.
Although the cuts are imminent, school districts are expected to continue providing bus service at least until March, according to David Walrath, legislative advocate for the Small School Districts’ Association. He said schools must give a 60-day notice before laying off bus drivers.
Eventually doing away with busing is an unthinkable option for some rural districts, according to Kevin Ogden, superintendent of the Julian Union School District.
“This cut hits small, rural school districts serving low-income families unfairly,” he said, calling school transportation a “lifeline” for poor.
Without buses, he said, “some parents may have to find themselves having to choose between their jobs and ensuring their children make it to and from school safely.”
The reductions are part of $1 billion in spending cuts triggered because state revenue fell short of optimistic projections.
“We’re not going to cut transportation in the middle of the year,” said Bernie Rhinerson, chief of staff for the San Diego Unified School District, which will lose about $4.5 million in bus funding. The district has an operating budget of just over $1 billion.
A breakdown of the cuts per student provided by the California School Employees Association shows a heavy burden on rural districts, even though the overall reduction may seem small.
Based on 2010-11 data used to estimate the busing cuts last spring, Warner Unified would face a loss of nearly $100,000 — which amounts to $396 per student. For Julian, it would be $282 per pupil and $179 at Mountain Empire.
San Diego Unified’s per pupil loss would come to $38, according to the association data.
Walrath said the small districts association will push the Legislature to spread the pain around more equitably.
Rural school officials held a news conference Wednesday to discuss the cuts. Some were at a loss at how they will deal with them.
Jackie Finch, transportation coordinator for the Dehesa school district and herself a bus driver, said, “We simply have nothing left to cut. … As a rural district, Dehesa is not able to reduce transportation by even a fraction.”
Justin Cunningham, superintendent of the 2,000-student Bonsall Union School District, said Bonsall will have to “find the means, whether it is reserves or some other way” to meet the $190,000 cut.
But he said the district won’t make any decisions until mid-January when the governor unveils his budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1.
Carmen Garcia, superintendent of the Borrego Springs Unified School District, detailed the plight of a rural school district with a small student population and vast miles to cover.
Her district has 500 students but they are spread over 700 square miles. She said the impact of the cuts would come to $170 per student.

Lakeside Union School District’s Brian Bristol called the cuts “one of the most treacherous things we’ve experienced in years.” He estimates that … if applied against the transportation budget, the cuts will mean 20 percent of his low-income students will have no way to reach school and as many as 20 jobs could be eliminated.
To get a sense of the proportion of the cuts, Alpine Unified Superintendent Tom Pellegrino’s said his 90-square-mile district is facing a $100,000 cut in a $400,000 budget that serves 600 bus riders. “The district’s entire budget for gas and electricity is $100,000,” he said.
“Some parents already pay a $1,000 fee to get their kids to school. Should we raise their fee?” he asked.
California does not require schools to transport students except when required by law, such as busing for special education students. Districts that provide bus service for all students can charge for the rides.
Gov. Jerry Brown said he had no choice on the home-to-school transportation funding because that program was among many specifically targeted in the budget if revenues only came up to a certain level.
“There aren’t many happy alternatives,” he said at the Sacramento news conference Tuesday when he announced the $1 billion in cuts.
He dismissed the viability of legal action to block the busing cuts by the Los Angeles Unified School District, contending the state is on solid ground.
As for districts that say they have no choice but to cut busing, the governor disagreed. He said they could take money from elsewhere.
“Any school district that wants to spend on … transportation can do that,” he said. “They have their funds and this is local flexibility to make whatever decision they want. So you can view this basically as a cut to the overall school system and eliminating, for at least this year, one categorical program.”
While decrying the transportation cuts, education officials across the state this week expressed relief that the state revenue shortfall was not as bad as had been feared, averting more severe school cuts.
Staff writer Michael Gardner contributed to this report.

 

Saturday, December 3, 2011

VOSD Sponsored Public Forum on Dec 7 - Offer your opinion and ask questions


Presents...
 
"Schools on the Brink" 
A live panel discussion
 
Thursday, December 8
 
7:00 pm
 
Panelists:
Richard Barrera
Scott Barnett
Jim Groth
Teresa Drew
Paul Bowers

Moderated By:
Andrew Donohue
Will Carless
 
border

Special 5-Part Series
  
NBC 7 San Diego 
 6pm News

Monday - Friday 
December 5th - 9th
   Need Some CliffsNotes?

Be sure to check out our supplemental reader guides starting Monday,
December 5, at voiceofsandiego.org.
 
 
Dear VOSD Reader,

San Diego city schools are in crisis. And, you don't have to be a parent to be concerned. From property values to the future of the work force, the fallout from a financial meltdown at the school district could impact everyone.

1. Watch and Learn 
As leaders in education coverage, voiceofsandiego.org is partnering with NBC 7 San Diego and the San Diego Foundation to provide the information you need to weigh in on this important issue.

Starting Monday, Dec. 5, we will begin a weeklong "Schools on the Brink" special San Diego Explained series on NBC 7 news at 6 p.m. Each evening we will break down a different element of this ongoing saga, including potential impacts on the city, what role the state and district played and proposed solutions.

Be sure to visit our "Schools on the Brink" section throughout the week for supplemental reader guides to go along with our TV segments. We'll be publishing new chapters each day. 

2. Be Heard 
If the state put you in charge of San Diego Unified School District, how would you fix things? Submit your thoughts on this form. Commentaries will run all week.

No doubt, after watching and reading these reports, you'll still have questions. And, we're giving you the opportunity to ask them!

Then, join us on Thursday, Dec. 8, for a special "Schools on the Brink" panel discussion with:

The panel will be moderated by our Andrew Donohue and Will Carless and will focus on solutions to the district's problems.

The event will take place at the McMillin Event Center at Liberty Station at 7pm. The public is encouraged to attend. voiceofsandiego.org readers have the opportunity to submit questions for the panelists in advance and several readers will be selected to ask their questions at the event.

Please feel free to invite anyone you think might be interested and be sure to send them to voiceofsandiego.org to learn about the education crisis in preparation for the event.

We hope to see you soon.                               

 
GreenSincerely,

Scott Lewis
CEO, voiceofsandiego.org
       
Take Ownership of                                              
Your Local News
Donate_button                                                                                       

UT Article - Dec 3 - SD school employees warned of cuts, layoffs

Hi,
Take note of the comments by various people: 
  • Bill Kowba (Superintendent)
  • Ron Little (SDUSD CFO)
  • Lora Duzyk (County Board of Education - responsible for approving SDUSD budget)
  • Bill Freeman (President of the teacher's union - SDEA).
Each has their own unique view of the situation.
Brian

SD school employees warned of cuts, layoffs


San Diego city schools chief Bill Kowba issued a sobering letter to some 14,000 employees Friday, warning about grim finances and layoff notices set to land in mailboxes before the holidays under the threat of midyear cuts.

Teachers are safe from midyear job cuts under state law that requires any potential layoffs to be signaled with March pink slips. Cafeteria workers, clerks, janitors and other workers may be terminated after a 45-day warning.

Superintendent Bill Kowba
About 55 nonteaching jobs are up for elimination by Feb. 2. However, a wave of layoff notices would be dispatched throughout the district to accommodate the seniority-based bumping process that gives seasoned employees the ability to take a position held by less-experienced colleague.
The San Diego Unified School District’s budget woes have been well-publicized for months and are unlikely to come as a surprise to employees. Even so, Kowba sought to provide all personnel with a “heads up” on the situation in Friday’s memo.
The district is bracing for midyear cuts of $26 million to $30 million to it’s $1.057 billion operating budget, based on disappointing financial projections from the state, setting the stage for a potentially devastating budget scenario for the 2012-13 school year. In October, Kowba made the alarming announcement that midyear cuts could push the district into insolvency and potentially force a state takeover of local campuses.
Making it through this school year would require the district to drain $22 million from a reserve account, spend $4.5 million in real estate proceeds, and impose a hiring freeze to save $1.5 million, Kowba said. Another $1.7 million to plug the shortfall would come from eliminating about 55 nonteaching jobs.
Kowba acknowledges the poor timing in his memo: “Unfortunately, the timing of the midyear cuts requires that the Human Resources Department begin the notice preparation process before the winter break.”
Next year, many more employees could lose jobs, Kowba said in the memo. The superintendent will release preliminary cost-cutting measures on Tuesday as the school board lays the ground work for another grim budget.
“... it is extremely difficult to achieve budget adjustments of this magnitude without drastic staffing reductions,” Kowba said in the letter. “Consequently, this list of budget solutions will include recommendations for significant layoffs touching all stakeholder groups, programs, and organizations in the district.”
Like other districts up and down the state, San Diego Unified has been bracing for midyear budget cuts ever since California’s independent legislative analyst issued dire revenue projections in November. A second and pivotal fiscal forecast is set to be released on Dec. 15 by the state Department of Finance.
The state balanced its current budget under the assumption that revenues would grow by $4 billion. Automatic cuts to state programs will start if revenues fall more than $1 billon short of that mark.
The report released last month from the state’s legislative analyst predicted revenues would come in $3.7 billion short, enough to trigger $1.35 billion in cuts to schools.
Gov. Jerry Brown must rely on the most favorable of the two state fiscal reports to authorize the triggers. But districts must begin balancing next year’s budget under the assumption that midyear are a given.

San Diego Unified Chief Financial Office Ron Little said the worst-case scenario would drive up the budget shortfall next year to $97 million. Even without midyear cuts, he said the deficit could reach $72 million.
“The economy is recovering, but more slowly than anticipated,” Little told the board Tuesday. “The state budget presents longtime and ongoing challenges.”
San Diego Unified has cut millions from its budget in recent years to cope with the state’s fiscal crisis. However, many have criticized the board for a series of decisions that have complicated the situation.
For example, the board spent about $30 million to hire back hundreds of laid off teachers this summer — rather than sock the money away — based on optimistic state revenue projections. The board also negotiated a contract with teachers that calls for raises to kick in next year at a cost of $21 million, a decision it now wants to revisit with labor representatives.
“The (San Diego) board wanted to give people back their jobs and give students the best education programs. In this kind of environment, that is very risky,” said Lora Duzyk, assistant superintendent at the San Diego County Office of Education. “They took a gamble. We don’t know yet if it was the right decision, or if — and how — they may have to pay for it.”
Bill Freeman, who represents the district’s some 7,000 teachers as president of the San Diego Education Association, said the union will not apologize for the raises that teachers were promised or the jobs he said they deserve. He called Kowba’s letter overly alarming, but he said he understands the district must meet a series of state budget deadlines.
Freeman would not discuss whether the union would agree to concessions. But he hinted that a compromise could be considered — if it is deemed necessary.
“Once we get real information from the state about real numbers — not projections — we will do what we have to do,” said Freeman, “We are optimistic. We do not believe the state will let this district go under.”
The board will meet at 2 p.m. on Tuesday at district headquarters, 4100 Normal Street, to consider layoff notices and other initiatives to get through midyear cuts. Trustees will also review cost-cutting measures to balance next year’s budget. The board is set to vote to adopt a first interim budget on Dec. 13 in time to get the document to the San Diego County Office of Education by the Dec. 15 deadline.



Letter to Employees

From: Smolens, Michael
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 5:01 PM
To: Smolens, Michael
Subject: FW: First Interim Report and Mid-Year Budget Cuts
Attachments: image001.jpg; image002.jpg


Dear District Employee:

The purpose of this email is to provide you with a “heads up” about a public 
discussion that will take place over the next few weeks about the district’s 
first interim financial report and mid-year cuts. At the Board meeting on Dec. 
6, 2011, I will present budget reduction recommendations to accommodate an 
estimated mid-year cut of approximately $26-30 million. At the same time, 
there will be an initial reading of draft first interim report budget 
solutions to balance a $91-97 million budget shortfall in 2012/13. On Dec. 13, 
2011, there will be a second reading of the first interim report budget 
solutions.

First Interim Financial Report
As background, every year the district is required to submit a first interim 
financial report to the San Diego County Office of Education (SDCOE) by Dec. 
15. This report highlights information on our financial condition for the 
first four months of the current fiscal year and a projection of our financial 
position for the next two years. With the submission of the report, the Board 
certifies the district’s ability to meet all financial commitments. Per SDCOE 
guidance, in this year’s first interim, we are required to assume that the 
State will impose a mid-year cut to K-12 funding and that we will not receive 
a Cost of Living Funding Adjustment (COLA) in 2012/13. As a result of these 
two assumptions and other fiscal planning factors, we have calculated a budget 
shortfall in 2012/13 of $91-97 million. To address the mid-year cut and next 
year’s shortfall, the first interim report will require the submission of a 
preliminary list of budget reductions for both scenarios. At this point, the 
list of reductions cannot include any assumption of negotiated budget savings 
from collective bargaining that may or may not materialize in the coming 
months.

Mid-year Cut Reductions and Timing Issues The State budget approved in June 
included a legal provision that automatically imposes funding cuts on K-12 
education should state revenues fall below targeted projections by more than 
$2 billion. Under this provision, the Governor must consider the more positive 
of two revenue assessments, one from the Legislative Analyst Office (LAO) and 
the other from the Department of Finance, in making a trigger decision. The 
LAO projection, released before Thanksgiving, estimated a state revenue 
shortfall of $3.7 billion, which, if confirmed by the Finance Department 
projections, would result in a mid-year General Fund reduction for San Diego 
Unified of approximately $26-30 million. The projection from the Finance 
Department will not be released until Dec. 15, after the district’s deadline 
to submit the first interim report to the County. Simply stated, we must act 
on a mid-year budget cut strategy before the Governor has the required 
financial reports that will determine if the mid-year cut trigger must be 
implemented.

At the Dec. 6 Board meeting, I will present recommendations to the Board to 
mitigate the mid-year cut by obtaining monies in the following areas:

  *   $22M – Projected year-end fund balances,
  *   $4.5M – Real estate sale proceeds,
  *   $1.7M – Mid-year classified staffing reduction savings, and
  *   $1.5M – Hiring freeze savings.
I will be initiating a strategic hiring freeze on all non-essential positions 
for the remainder of this fiscal year to help replenish our year-end balance 
and mitigate the scope of the 2012/13 deficit. In order to achieve the needed 
budget reductions in this fiscal year, the classified staffing reduction must 
be initiated this month to provide impacted employees with the required 45-day 
notice. Unfortunately, the timing of the mid-year cuts requires that the Human 
Resources Department begin the notice preparation process before the winter 
break.

2012/13 Budget Development
Like the mid-year cut scenario, the 2012/13 $91-97 million reduction situation 
must be addressed before the Governor has acted. In this case, the Governor 
will not release his draft 2012/13 budget until early January 2012. The first 
interim report must also include a list of solutions to address the projected 
deficit without negotiated employee concessions. After five years of 
significant budget reductions totaling more than $450 million, it is extremely 
difficult to achieve budget adjustments of this magnitude without drastic 
staffing reductions. Consequently, this list of budget solutions will include 
recommendations for significant layoffs touching all stakeholder groups, 
programs, and organizations in the district.

As the new year opens, we will be increasing our advocacy efforts in 
Sacramento and consulting with our employee groups about concessions that can 
mitigate the drastic staffing reductions that must be included in the first 
interim report submission to the County Office.

I believe that we can weather this storm if we continue to work together 
collaboratively and creatively on a range of solutions. Advocacy with our 
elected representatives must be ongoing to urge them to find revenue solutions 
for the California budget crisis that can stave the tide of devastation 
hitting public education in California.

Thank you for your continued dedication and commitment to our students as we 
continue to face this unprecedented economic crisis.

[Kowba Signature]
Bill Kowba
Superintendent



Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Draft School Realignment Presentation - for Nov 29 BoE Meeting

Draft Realignment Recommendations, 11-29-11

Mtg: Nov 16 - PBMS/MBHS merger?

I was not present at the meeting.  The meeting was led by Jennifer Tandy (Chair-Elect) to the following agenda:


  • 6:00  Welcome - agenda review and goals for the evening
  • 6:05  Update - BoED recent decisions, MB Cluster status, Scott Barnett recent emails and requests, Board presentation Nov. 29, YMCA, Civic groups' consensus
  • 6:15  Brief presentation by Jenny Sims, IB Coordinator for PBMS -IB MYP (International Baccalaureate Middle Years Program)
  • 6:30  Brief presentation by Fred Hilgers, MBHS principal - MBHS IB information
  • 6:45  Words from Mitzi Moreno, MB Cluster Area Superintendent
  • 6:55 Julie Martel and Fred Hilgers present viable PBMS and MBHS scenarios based on parent, staff and community input thus far
  • 7:15  Open Discussion and Q&A
  • 7:50  Next Steps
Below is a letter from Ms. Tandy to the community sent after the meeting:

Dear MB Cluster Members,

I felt Wednesday night's cluster meeting was very informative and productive. Mitzi Moreno, our Area Superintendent, and the cluster officers will be presenting Scott Barnett with the information and opinions gathered at the meeting. I feel confident we will be able to articulate a positive direction and clearer vision for the future of Pacific Beach Middle School and Mission Bay High. Thank you all for your impassioned input. I have attached a more formal draft of the ideas that were presented last night.

As I said at the meeting, the reason our schools have grown stronger in enrollment, in test scores and in excitement, over the last few years is not because of the District. We have grown because of your commitment to our schools. Your time, your energy, your money...your ideas put into action. Grass fields, murals, enrichment programs, tutoring, music, art, science, computers...the families and teachers fill in where the District leaves off. If we keep up this extraordinary work with the entire MB Cluster in mind, we will continue to attract students, raise test scores and prosper as a community. We must control the conversation, the direction and the destiny of our schools. This proposal is the first step in taking that control. Thank you for all your hard work.

Have a safe and restful Thanksgiving.

Jennifer Tandy


Below is a draft document articulating the vision discussed during the meeting. It was not ratified, but was intended to capture the conversation.

Cluster Proposal Draft 11-17-11

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

UT Article - Nov 22 Article - Charter School in Chula Vista Improves Dramatically

There is a reference to a particular book:  Pedagogy of the Oppressed that expresses thoughts and lessons learned teaching in Brazil.

Read this carefully and consider what really produced the enormous improvement in test scores.  Was it:

  • Language program (multiple languages)?
  • Respect for diversity?
  • Tailoring the program to the community needs?
  • Magnet style campus where students of similar interests attend?
  • Inspiring families and parents to be engaged?
  • Superior teaching techniques?
  • Superb educational leadership at the administrative level (e.g. principal)?
  • Removing students that are not interested in academics?
  • Self selection - only those students/families interested in education attend?

Chula Vista school’s turnaround turns heads

Elementary charter has gone from federal improvement list to distinguished status


A charter school in Chula Vista was performing so poorly on state assessments that it made the federal watch list for three years. Now it has staged a dramatic turnaround that is attracting international attention.
Today, the 822-student school has test scores among the highest in the Chula Vista Elementary School District and has been recognized as a California Distinguished School. The dual-language immersion campus has become a type of laboratory where professors from San Diego State University as well as educators from Mexico, England and Switzerland visit, hoping to discover the secret to its success.
Chula Vista Learning Community Charter, which was on the federal “program improvement” list until 2008, has raised its Academic Performance Index scores from 680 in 2005 to 880 in 2011, exceeding the state goal of 800. Every March, hundreds of parents converge on its parking lot to submit applications, with some camping overnight. Last spring, 320 applicants were turned away.
At this school, everyone has a role in the education of children.
Teachers are encouraged to be “teacher scholars” and are expected to keep up with research being done in the field of education. Parent involvement is a high priority, with parents required to volunteer 30 hours a year, including attending parent meetings where administrators offer tips for helping with homework and review lessons their children are being taught.
Students at the school take half their courses in English and half in Spanish each day, and also get weekly instruction in Mandarin, a third language added two years ago. About 95 percent of students at the K-8 school are Latino, with about 53 percent English-language learners and about half come from families poor enough they qualify for free or reduced lunch.
Parents say they like the school for the language immersion and rigorous instruction. Martha Garcia, whose 4-year-old daughter is in kindergarten, said she’s pleased so far. “She reads already in both languages,” Garcia said.
Those who cannot meet the time commitment are asked to leave. “We are a choice school. You choose to be here,” said school Director Jorge Ramirez.
The campus’ turnaround caught the eye of researchers at San Diego State University who were looking at schools that have had success in closing the achievement gap.
SDSU professor Cristina Alfaro is among a team of seven SDSU researchers with the College of Education with expertise in literacy, biliteracy, administration and child development who are studying every aspect of the school — from how its administrators lead staff to how teachers collaborate and develop curriculum to better target the backgrounds of their students.
Alfaro said teachers at the school work closely together, analyze test data to see where gaps exist and alter teaching plans to shore up weak areas.
The course correction came about, she and others say, after the school embraced what she calls the “power of belief systems.” Administrators focused on making sure that everyone on staff believes all students can succeed and won’t excuse failures because of their students’ backgrounds.
High expectations are set for all students, and parents are seen as critical partners in the process.
Alfaro, who teaches aspiring teachers, said her SDSU students often want a simple recipe for what works. She said the key is to adapt the curriculum to students. Teachers at the school look at the students’ cultural and linguistic backgrounds and develop curricula that connects to their experiences.
“They are innovative, they are relevant, they are cutting edge and they are research-based,” she said.
Alfaro has consulted at the school, helping lead some teacher trainings and also teaches one of her SDSU classes at the campus to be closer to students in the South Bay and to tap resources at the school. When they need K-8 students to demonstrate a teaching approach, for example, they have a ready supply available.
“It has become an awesome laboratory for us,” she said.
The school this year is focusing on having students engage in critical discussions with classmates about texts they read and having them explain their thought processes. To prepare for the emphasis on dialogue, every teacher read and discussed the book “Pedagogy of the Oppressed,” written by Harvard professor Paulo Freire about his experiences of teaching in literacy programs in Brazil.
Alfaro said the book talks about the importance of believing that all children can learn and not engaging in the bigotry of low expectations.
“It has some really strong language but the reason we like this book is it really challenges teachers and principals and the community at large in the way that we think and we address situations, especially when working with students from lower socio-economic backgrounds and English learners,” she said. “It is not so much as giving you more methods and more strategies. Equally important is teacher ideology.”
Ramirez, who has led the school since it opened in 1998, says it is important the charter not “flatline” in its performance. When he talks about his teachers, he uses words like “intellectual” and “lifelong learners” and says they are continually seeking to improve their methods.
Second-grade teacher Monica Lucero, who has been at the school for 13 years, said the achievement turnaround occurred after teachers began to pay closer attention to student test data and curriculum and focusing on providing assistance those who needed it.
“We made parents aware of where their children were at and where they could help at home. There were a lot more workshops for parents, a lot more things for our target students (such as) second-language learners,” Lucero said. “The director does a good job of always bringing up what the expectations are to parents. Everyone knows what they are accountable for.”
Administrators say they try to balance classrooms in the lottery process. Entering kindergartners are assessed on an observation day and grouped into categories of above, average and below and then randomly selected. “We don’t just take the cream of the crop,” said Francisco Lopez, dean of students.
One way parents are included in the school is through monthly parent meetings, where administrators highlight ways they can help with homework and learning.
In October, for example, Lopez ran a crowd of more than 200 parents through a lesson on narrative writing. Parents were given handouts in English and Spanish and read a Greek myth about Arachne the spinner. Lopez then called on parents who raised their hands to answer questions about how plot lines made up different actions in the story.
“You are our biggest team member,” he told parents at one point. “You are the one who is going to help us get students excited about what they are learning in class.”
Alfaro said she’s amazed at the turnout.
“I’ve been to some of these sessions. They have parents out the door, standing room only. You’d think it was a concert or something,” Alfaro said.

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Recent U-T Editorials - Kowba Letter (Oct 13) on Budget / U-T Commentary on School Funding (Oct 13/25)

Recently the BoE has avoided cutting transportation and closing campuses. BoE Trustee Barnett proposed adjustments to compensation, but this too has not been approved.

Little appears to have changed regarding funds from the State of California (i.e. there still appear to be mid-year cuts for SDUSD and a deficit projected for AY 2012/13) and nothing appears to have been decided by the BoE with regards to how to provide public education with the funds available from the State of California.

Below are Op-Ed pieces published in the Union-Tribune recently. The first is a letter from Superintendent Kowba to the readers. The second two are editorials from the Union-Tribune Editorial Boards. Each describes briefly the financial situation at SDUSD.

New cuts could push San Diego schools to insolvency - W. Kowba

October 13, 2011

The state has responded to the current economic crisis with budget cuts that will devastate public education in California. This statement may sound overly dramatic, but it will become a reality if the governor levies an additional $1.5 billion in midyear cuts on K-12 education in January in accordance with the budget act.
School districts throughout California are at the end of the budget rope. More than $15 billion has been cut from California’s public school budgets during the last four years. Most districts have used every budget trick in the bag to get through these difficult times, and options to keep cuts away from the classroom have been exhausted. This year, schools have opened with far fewer teachers and support staff than needed to ensure quality educational programs.
San Diego Unified School District has been forced to cut $450 million from its budget since 2007-08. These cumulative reductions have been sweeping and devastating, and are now being felt in all of our classrooms. In September, our students were greeted by several hundred fewer teachers and more than 500 fewer support staff. There are now more than 2,200 fewer staff serving students in our schools than in 2008, a reduction of about 15 percent.
Last January, Gov. Jerry Brown proposed a budget that balanced cuts with new tax revenues to support public education. That bold proposal was dependent on a bipartisan compromise in the Legislature that would have given voters the opportunity to decide if they wanted to support public education. Compromise was not reached.
With no Republican support, the governor had no choice but to sign a budget that was balanced on precarious revenue expectations. Knowing that the new state budget was based more on hope than reality, the Legislature approved a budget with “trigger cuts” that could drastically cut education funding midyear if revenue projections in December fall below the revenue assumptions built into July’s budget act.
This last-minute budget gimmick included the option to shorten the school year by seven days as a way for districts to accommodate the revenue reductions. As with many last-minute budget solutions, no one analyzed the impacts that midyear cuts would have on our schools. The school year for California’s children has already been reduced by five days as a result of last year’s budget cuts. Eliminating another seven days of instruction is a terrible idea that cannot be implemented by almost 50 percent of California’s school districts, which have closed collective-bargaining contracts.
The countdown to midyear cuts has already begun. For the first two months of this fiscal year, California is already nearly $600 million below its revenue projections. In December, the state must estimate its revenue for the year. Should those projections fall more than $2 billion below the budget target, K-12 education could be immediately cut by as much as $1.5 billion. San Diego Unified would be pressed to reduce its general fund by approximately $30 million on top of more than $80 million previously removed to build this budget.
Even without midyear cuts, San Diego Unified is facing a deficit of approximately $60 million for the 2012-13 school year. After four straight years of budget reductions, balancing next year’s budget with a deficit of that magnitude will be more difficult than ever. It will necessitate more layoffs, class-size increases, and serious negotiations with our employee groups about salary and benefit concessions that could mitigate the number of layoffs. The Board of Education has asked employee groups to begin these difficult conversations. The fiscal health and solvency of the district will require that we enter these negotiations with open minds and a spirit of collaboration to reach workable and fair budget solutions that can preserve the quality of education we provide to San Diego’s children.
Should the state pull the trigger on midyear cuts, the district will have few viable options to solve a $30 million funding reduction in January. San Diego Unified will have to use already depleted reserves and one-time solutions. This quick fix will only escalate the projected deficit for 2012-13 to an unmanageable level of more than $100 million. Under that worst-case scenario, even with employee concessions and hundreds of teacher and support staff layoffs, a balanced budget will be very difficult to achieve, challenging the fiscal solvency of the district.
At this point, the future of our children is in the hands of the Legislature and the governor. Will they find an alternative to pulling the trigger, or will they give Californians an opportunity to vote on education funding, before it’s too late to save our schools?
Kowba is superintendent of the San Diego Unified School District

For San Diego Unified, apocalypse now - Union-Tribune Editorial Board

 October 13, 2011
Grim revenue reports appear to make it a forgone conclusion that automatic state spending cuts will be triggered this winter, as critics of the smoke-and-mirrors 2011-12 budget have been predicting since it was adopted in June.
These cuts will be disastrous for many school districts. The primary tool the budget law gives school districts to reduce costs – cutting salaries by shortening the school year seven days – isn’t readily achievable in many districts, where contract changes require the concurrence of employee unions. Many unions believe they have made enough concessions and that cost savings should be found elsewhere. But that is just not a position that squares with the reality of school finances, where employee compensation is by far the biggest spending category.
Which brings us to San Diego Unified, which has such contracts with its unions. In a commentary in today’s U-T (opposite page), Superintendent Bill Kowba says the district would have to make about $30 million in devastating midyear cuts if the budget trigger provision kicks in and overall state school funding is reduced by $1.5 billion. Kowba urges Gov. Jerry Brown and the Legislature to somehow find the money to avoid the trigger cuts, perhaps by reviving a budget compromise in which voters would be asked to increase taxes to provide more money for education.
We are sympathetic, but it is simply not realistic to expect Sacramento – or voters – to come to the rescue. It also has to be noted that the district has made its problems even worse. By early 2010, the folly of the district’s traditional practice of budgeting for salaries on the assumption that revenue provided by the state would always go up had become apparent. With employee compensation eating up 90 percent of all general spending, it was plain that something basic had to be done about pay and benefits beyond just temporary furloughs.
Instead, however, the board approved phased-in raises of 7.2 percent for all employees in 2012-13 and made no changes in policies that provide many teachers and some other employees automatic 3.8 percent annual raises based on years on the job.
Now strategy no. 1 for district leaders is getting unions to agree to forgo the pending raises. We hope union members are understanding.
But whatever short-term fixes are used to address the current crisis, in the big picture, a San Diego Unified budget model that assumes automatic pay raises for many employees just doesn’t work anymore.
Unless something changes, it won’t be long before the entire budget goes to employee compensation – with little left for athletics, musical instruments, buses, janitorial services, computers, Internet access and other important needs. San Diegans urgently need their school district leaders – teachers, administrators and board members – to accept the financial realities and work together to avoid catastrophe in the classroom.

Saving San Diego schools - Union Tribune Editorial Board

October 25, 2011
“Because of the need for reducing the tax burden, class sizes were increased, teachers’ salaries were lowered and drastic economies applied.” – From the San Diego Unified School District’s official history, regarding financial difficulties faced in the 1930s
The renewed warnings of impending insolvency of city schools pose what is probably the greatest financial challenge for the district since the Great Depression, and possibly since the district’s first school opened in August 1854 in a rented room with a single teacher paid $40 a month. None of today’s financial options are good, none of the possible solutions easy. The current level of quality education for 131,500 children on more than 180 campuses with some 6,600 teachers is threatened.
The school board tonight will hear details of staff’s recommendation to close, consolidate or relocate dozens of schools next year and is expected to discuss the impact of insolvency on California’s second-largest district. Options such as the sale of district real estate and dramatic cutbacks in what’s left of the school bus program will also be outlined and updated. No decision on school closures is expected until December.
San Diego Unified faces a deficit next year in its $1 billion operating budget of between $60 million and $118 million, with the worst-case scenario looming if additional cutbacks in state funding are automatically triggered later this year.
School board President Richard Barrera blames the state for the financial crisis and looks to the state for help. “The reason (for the crisis) is because the Legislature and the governors in California have decided that they would rather make cuts to public education than raise taxes on wealthy individuals and large corporations,” he says.
Despite the crisis, the district continues to hire back teachers whose layoff notices were rescinded four months ago. And blaming the state ignores past board decisions to continue to grant automatic step increases in pay for many teachers and to approve phased-in raises of 7.2 percent for all employees beginning next school year. And it ignores the reality that the state is in no position to bail out San Diego Unified or the many other California districts in turmoil.
But it serves little purpose now for the district to point fingers of blame, or for angry, skeptical parents and the teachers union to label district warnings as crying wolf.
The reality is there isn’t enough money. The reality also is that 90 percent of general spending by the district goes to compensation. It is unfair to all and a shame for the students, but, barring an unexpected bailout by the state, school closures, transportation, class sizes and, yes, compensation all have to be put on the table.
Now is the time, beginning tonight, for the board, staff, teachers, parents, the broader community and state officials to come together to save San Diego Unified as best they can.

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Plan Remains to Close PBMS and Consolidate into a 6 - 12 IB Academy at the MBHS Site

Below is an email exchange between myself and Scott Barnett regarding the potential IB Academy at the MB Site.  I think the general concept is clear, however the details can truly determine the success of this concept.  Read below and decide for yourself what is necessary to ensure that this concept is successful.

Email:
 
Thu, November 3, 2011 12:52:29 AM
Re: Presentation on Future FOPBSS and Cluster Agenda? Budget plan. Also PB/MB. IB Academy
From:
Family Catanzaro <pbcatanzaro@pacbell.net> 
To:"Scott Barnett, SDUSD Board Trustee"
Cc:Stover Philip ; Merino Mitzi ; jennifer tandy ; Julie Martel; Fred Hilgers; Pam Deitz ; Amy Monroe

Scott,
I understand the concept.  I think the rest of the community understands the concept as well.  SDUSD saves $1M by closing one of our campuses.  The number of students at PBMS/MBHS without SDUSD transportation is small.  We have discussed in at length.  This is understood.  The details are what count at this point. 

However, the plan is predicated on the reduction in student body size to the point at which the two populations can fit onto a single campus.  There are several questions that remain unanswered with this approach:

1.  When will transportation be phased out to encourage the reduction in student population to the point at which this can occur.  Clearly it cannot occur if the enrollment in AY 2012/13 is the same as the enrollment as AY2011/12 and the BoE did not make a decision to reduce transportation in recent BoE meetings.
2.  When enrollment drops, teachers will be reallocated to other campuses.  Will the BoE support a policy to allow MB-IB to retain teachers that have been IB trained in spite of Post-and-Bid and seniority/tenure rules in the SDEA contract?
3.  Will the BoE allocate Prop S funds to reconfigure the campus buildings to accommodate the 6 - 12 program or will the new MB-IB campus be expected to function with its existing facility?
4.  What is the minimum student body size required to operate such a campus?  What will the class sizes be for such a campus?  Will there be enough students with sufficient preparation to be successful in the resulting limited enrollment at each grade level?  (e.g. 100 - 225 students in each graduating class)
5.  What funds will be provided to train staff to teach multiple grade levels (there are too few students to guarantee that each teacher will only teach a single grade level)?
6.  How will Special Education, Title 1 support, EL support, and IEP support be allocated for the smaller student body?  What funds will be provided by the district for Title 1 / EL support given it is unlikely for the new MB-IB campuse to achieve the existing and projected thresholds for supporting these students?
7.  Will the BoE allow the new MB-IB campus to implement an entrance exam to ensure students are prepared for the rigorous IB curriculum? (other public schools do this - most notably Stuyvesant of NYC)
8.  Current enrollment in some IB classes indicate that there may be insufficient students to populate IB classes if the size of the graduating class is significantly reduced.  In order to ensure critical mass in the classrooms for English literature, Mathematics, Sciences, History, ... will the BoE allow the MB-IB campus to require a minimum course load in IB classes (e.g. minimum of three IB classes each academic year)?

Few of these questions can be answered directly by our MB Cluster staff.  I imagine that Fred Hilgers and/or Julie Martel can prepare a pro-forma curriculum that lays out the courses anticipated for a range of student body sizes (e.g. 700 = the existing residents that attend PBMS/MBHS; 1870 = maximum number of students possible at the MBHS today).  I think that this is necessary.  However, the remainder of the questions above are up to you and the remainder of the BoE trustees.

Phil Stover has been generous with his and his staff's time, but their opinions and plans are often overruled by the BoE as evidenced in the last few weeks.  The onus is upon you and the remainder of the BoE members to address the majority of the questions above.

I invite the entire BoE to the next MB Cluster meeting, Nov 16.  The entire BoE should hear the plan you propose and provide the commitment to our community.

If the entire BoE is not behind this plan, it is a potential death sentence for the MB Cluster.  Some in the community, including myself, are skeptical of the BoE's resolve and commitment to this plan.  If it is not supported by addressing almost all of the items above, then I fear the result will be that we will have a small, 6 - 12 grade campus with no IB program.  Without that academic program, the new campus is unlikely to attract a large number of non-residents whose parents will drive them to the campus.  The resulting student body of residents will be approximately 700 students.  Will the BoE allow such a small high school to continue?  Not likely under the current financial pressure.  Under these assumptions, without BoE commitment financially and in terms of policy and exceptions to the SDEA contract, combining our campuses into a 6 - 12 grade program will be the beginning of the end of the Cluster.

I hold no sway over the BoE to invite them to our Cluster meeting.  I have invited them to prior Cluster meetings and invited them to our feedback meeting with Mr. Stover.  The only BoE member to attend was yourself.  As grateful as I am for your support, this type of MB-IB campus requires more than just your resolve.  What can you do to ensure that the remainder of the BoE will be present when you present the plan?  What can you do to ensure that they will listen, engage, and provide support for the plan?

Regards,
Brian Catanzaro




From: "Scott Barnett, SDUSD Board Trustee"
To: Amy Monroe ; "pbcatanzaro@pacbell.net" Cc: Stover Philip; Mitzi Merino ; Julie Martel ; Frederick Hilgers ; "jentandy"; "deitzfamily" ; "kim@schoettle
Sent: Thu, November 3, 2011 12:22:52 AM
Subject: Presentation on Future FOPBSS and Cluster Agenda? Budget plan. Also PB/MB. IB Academy

Plan to save SDUSD from insolvency

I would appreciate the opportunity to present my budget plan to the cluster and get feed back.

I think it's fair to say this will be the overriding issue for many months/years to come. But we face major decisions as early as mid December. 

PB/MB. IB Academy.

Also, as you may be aware, the concept of closing PB Middle and creating an IB Academy with MBHS is still alive.  I have received (mostly positive) feedback to date from cluster parents, but clearly it needs to have a lot more community input and discussion. Even if it decided to proceed, at best case it would be 13/14. 

Staff will be reaching out to you to discuss this prior to the board taking this and other school consolidation issues up again on November 29.

Thanks

SB

Thursday, October 27, 2011

VoSD - Plan in the works for Cuts without Closing Sites

VoSD link to articles regarding reducing the costs at SDUSD without closing sites:

http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/public_safety/pavement/article_9b91661c-00e5-11e1-a1a7-001cc4c002e0.html


However, apparently recent actions have resulted in reducing SDUSD's bond rating.  This will make it more expensive for SDUSD to borrow money to make payroll.

http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/public_safety/pavement/article_3574c4e6-00e0-11e1-96f0-001cc4c002e0.html


Moody's SDUSD Credit Rating

Array of Recent VoSD Articles and BoE Video Link

Below are links to several Voice of San Diego articles regarding School Closure and a link to the video of the BoE meeting last Tuesday.

The U-T ran a front page article on the BoE meeting.  However, little new to this blog was presented other than comments from a consultant, Ron Bennett.  The comments from Mr. Bennett were not detailed enough to identify a potential path towards or away from insolvency or state receivership.

Video of BoE Meeting



http://www.sandi.net/cms/lib/CA01001235/Centricity/Domain/431/reports/2011/1025/video2.html
8:30 CPJMA performance
106:20 Ron Little on X Factor
116:05 Transportation 5-year Plan
178:10 School Realignment/Closure

VoSD Links


CPJMA performance photos
http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/credentialed/article_d201eb68-fffa-11e0-b3d4-001cc4c002e0.html

How Schools were targeted for closure:
http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/public_safety/pavement/article_0f71c7e0-003a-11e1-98d5-001cc4c03286.html

Declining enrollment:
http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/clipboard/article_68ee3a56-0008-11e1-aeaf-001cc4c03286.html

Board of Ed meeting recap:
http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/public_safety/pavement/article_c1ecc21c-ff9a-11e0-b5bd-001cc4c002e0.html

"Unfinished questions"
http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/clipboard/article_7461e0a4-003f-11e1-a5b3-001cc4c002e0.html

MB Principal's Impact Report

The document below was delivered to the Realignment Committee as feedback.

From: Devicariis Susan [mailto:sdevicariis@sandi.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:47 AM
To: Barnett Scott; Hilgers Frederick; Merino Mitzi; Stover Philip; Tavasci
Magdalena; Castillo-Duvall Elizabeth; Turner Sherry; Martel Julie; Brian
Cantanzaro; Amy Monroe; jennifer tandy
Subject: Mission Bay Cluster Principal Feedback Report

Hello All,

The cluster principals met on October 25th to discuss the potential school
closure.  The principals wanted to make sure that central office folks
understood that there would be some impacts that would need to be addressed.
We all understand the need to right size the district and we will do
everything in our power to assure our families in the cluster are supported.
If you have any questions regarding our information, please let Julie Martel
know as she is our cluster leader.  Thank you for your consideration.



Susan DeVicariis
School Principal
Kate Sessions Elementary School
2150 Beryl Street
San Diego, CA 92109

858-273-3111


Mission Bay Cluster Principal Impact Report